Thoughts on Re’eh (Deut. 11:26-16:17)

Blessings and curses. God makes promises to His people that He fully intends on keeping. He promised Abraham that he would be the father of a nation so large that it would be impossible to number them. He promised Adam that in the day that he ate the fruit of the forbidden tree, he would die. God promised David that his seed would be on the throne of Israel for eternity. God promised Noah that He would never again flood the earth so as to destroy it. He promised Moses that He would deliver the Israelites from the egyptians and bring them into a land that was previously promised to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

In this Parasha, God makes a conditional promise to the Israelites. This promise is not conditional in that whether He keeps it or not will change, but in the sense that the fruit of that promise would depend on Israel’s response to God’s command. On one hand, God promises a blessing in they are faithful to obey His commands, and a curse if they turn aside and chase after “other gods that you have not known.” This promise has 2 potential outcomes, each of which God is faithful to deliver on, as proven throughout the millennia of Israel’s history.

The next chapter focuses on God’s expectation for how He is to be worshipped, as well as the limitation on where certain acts of worship may be carried out, namely sacrifices. Prior to the Exodus, Israel’s forefathers were free to make altars and offer sacrifices wherever they found themselves in the moment. Throughout the Torah prior to the Exodus, Abraham and Isaac, and many of their contemporaries, would construct altars to God near their homes, or wherever they journeyed if the cause and opportunity arose. Once God spoke to the Israelites at Sinai and laid out His expectations for how He is to be worshiped, the people were no longer free to offer sacrifices where they pleased, but only “in the place where the LORD your God shall choose to make His name dwell.” Any person who took it upon themselves to attempt to make a sacrifice outside the tabernacle – or later the Temple – would suffer the consequences of breaking God’s explicit command against doing so. God instructs the Israelites to utterly destroy the “high places” of idol worship put in place by the canaanites, and tells them that they are not to worship Him in that manner. God’s commands do not need to make sense for us to be willing to obey and keep them. However, we can see where this practice of “free spirited” view of worship can lead people to unrighteous acts. Just look at the recent explosive growth of “new age” practices within modern “christian” movements, where so-called believers are adopting demonic and satanic practices while claiming they are repurposing them for Christ. God has laid out very clear directions for how He is and is not to be worshipped.

Following this warning, God lays out strict warnings against following the example of the nations they were to dispossess and copying the rituals and traditions they had put in place for worshipping their false gods. In verse 4, God very clearly warns the people, “You shall not worship the LORD your God in that way.” God wants His people to worship Him in a manner that pleases Him. And this makes sense! If a man were to try to honor his wife by doing something he knows she hates, would he be successful in pleasing his wife? Of course not! God told the Israelites in the previous Torah portion (Eikev) that the children of Israel were not to think that their own righteousness had somehow earned them the Land that they were to possess. Rather, God makes it very clear that the Land was currently inhabited by wicked people who had spat in God’s face and earned His wrath, and it was because of their abominable wickedness that they were to be destroyed. And Israel’s possession of this Land was only to occur if they obeyed the command of God to go in and utterly destroy them for their wickedness, for the sake of the promise He formerly made to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

The next chapter deals with false prophets. The text makes it clear that a false prophet does not necessarily have to make a false prophecy to be considered a false prophet. The test of a prophet is not always whether or not his prophecy comes true. More important than the result of his prophecy is the intent behind the prophet’s message. If a person claims to receive visions from God that come true, but the prophet uses this validation to deceive people into disobeying God’s commands, this prophet is a false prophet and a deceiver and should be put to death. The true test of a person’s motives lie in their actions: do they seek to inspire obedience to God, or rebellion against him? And this is true not only of prophets, but v. 6-11 clarify that even if your own family member entices you to rebel against God’s commands, they are not to be spared the same fate.

Clean vs. Unclean

In the middle of the commandments pertaining to abstaining from consuming blood in chapter 12, God clarifies the distinction between eating of a sacrificed animal and eating a meal.

When it comes to animals offered as a sacrifice, God sets clear expectations for the handling and selection of the animals to be offered. Further, God clearly prohibits eating of sacrificed animals in one’s own home. Only the Tabernacle or Temple were to be sites for offering sacrifices to God. As such, one was expected to eat of the meat of that sacrifice within the confines of the Holy Place where God’s name was set. The difference is in the purpose of the meal. God clearly foresaw that the Israelites would be faced with questions about eating meat in a regular, non-sacrificial context, so he gives clear guidance, “If you crave meat, you may eat meat within any of your towns, as much as you desire.” The only real caveat on eating meat within one’s home was to abstain from consuming the blood, “for the blood is the life, and you shall not eat the life with the flesh.”

In the midst of these instructions for eating both ceremonially sacrificed and everyday meat, God makes a critical clarification pertaining to the eating of non-ceremonial meat: “The unclean and the clean may eat of it.” Isn’t clean and unclean a food thing tho? No. Cleanliness was a state of being that a person attained based on their actions and proximity to others. Just as the utensils in the temple were considered ritually clean, and as such were not to be taken out of the Temple in order to not defile them, ritual cleanness and uncleanliness could be transferred or obtained based on a number of requirements and situations. What is being referred to here are the people. The people who are unclean should be welcomed to eat at the dinner table, because cleanness was only defined by the person’s relationship with the Temple and the ability to enter and service or sacrifice within the Temple. There was no restriction put in place by God on whether a person could merely eat with another person, whether they were native born or a stranger.

This principle was distorted throughout the centuries following the inhabitation of Israel by God’s people, to the point that it was considered a cultural taboo for a Jew to eat with a gentile merely because that gentile may be “unclean” or unfit to enter the temple based on what they did for a living or if they ascribed to the dietary commands or not. I believe it is this very confusion that caused Peter to be hesitant to welcome Cornelius into his house. Cornelius was a God-fearing man who gave of his income and “feared God with all his household.” Cornelius, in God’s eyes, was considered clean (holy) because his heart was set on pleasing God. When Cornelius set out to visit Peter, God prepared Peter’s heart by correcting this false notion of clean versus unclean when it comes to people. “What God has made clean (holy), do not call common (unclean).” This is not a commentary on what is or isn’t acceptable to eat in God’s eyes. The point of this vision of Peter’s was that God alone has the power to make a person, place, animal, or object clean/holy or unclean/common. Just as Paul says that the Torah itself is not sin, but rather makes known what is sin, people or things that are clean or unclean are not so because of what they are, but rather because of their relationship and position in God’s plan. If God declares something is unclean, no man can make it clean. If God declares something is clean, no make can make it clean. As such, we are not to make distinctions between people based on their place or heritage, but rather we should show love to all and welcome all people from every walk of life to our table in order to share God’s provision for us with them.

Thoughts on Eikev (Deut. 7:12-11:25)

8:2 “You shall remember the whole way that the LORD your god has led you through these forty years in the wilderness, that He might humble you, testing you to know what was in your heart, wherther you would keep His commandments or not.”

God tests us in order to prove us. The trials He leads us through are not punishments, but refinement. God did not give the Israelites an easy task, but instead says “He humbled you and let you hunger.” God never promises to give us an easy time of being refined. The road is often difficult, painful, and miserable if we lean on our own abilities. We would be wise to remember to trust in God to be faithful to provide for us. He promises us that He cares for us more than the flowers of the field, and they lack nothing. We are so much more important to Him than daisies, we should not doubt that He will give us what we need.

But what if He allows us to hunger? What if the paycheck comes in late, and we are forced to reckon with our faith. Is God any less faithful just because we can’t see our own way through the wilderness? In times of questioning the right path, our guide will never fail us.

Moses continues to tell the Israelites that God fed them manna in order to teach them that we do not live by bread alone. Their hunger was for a purpose. Their desperation for water was to cause them to rely on God. We so often feel helpless or depressed when we don’t have what we think we need, but we should be careful to examine our hearts and draw near to God to know whether our thirst is something He is allowing in order to teach us to ddepend on him.

“Know then, in your heart, as a man disciplines his son, the LORD your God disciplines you.”

As a parent, my desire for my children is to teach them to trust me and obey my commands without questioning or needing understanding. When I discipline my son or my daughter, it is not (or at least it shouldn’t be) out of anger or spite, to cause them to be afraid of me. I want my children to know the sound of my voice, so that when I tell them to do something, they obey, and are not mislead by other voices in this world calling them to follow after evil desires.

“For the LORD your God is bringing you into a good land…”

God allowed the Israelites to wonder, to be tested, to be refined, and put them through trials that caused them to rely on Him because He knew that once they were in the good land, they would be tempted to think that they had somehow earned it themselves, and would stray away from obeying His commands. Moses sternly warns them about this, saying, “take care, lest you forget the Lord your God by not keeping his commandments.” It is God who gives us what we need, so that we will be reminded of His provision and faithfulness. We ought to be careful then to not forget His mercy, and be tempted to think that we somehow accomplished it by our own power.

Attempting to respond to some common misconceptions

The following is my response to several arguments that were presented to me by someone close to me, in an effort to discount the value in seeking to live a Godly life by following His commandments found in the Torah. These arguments are very similar to my own background, and represent what I believe is the underlying issue with modern day Christianity and it’s failure to produce fruit that the world can see, which would cause a turning of hearts back to God. All of the presented arguments will be in bold, with my responses in italics. I will begin with what I believe to be the basic principles that should be the foundation to a Godly approach to understanding Scripture and leading a life that pleases God, based on the belief that God is never changing, and that Jesus did not come to do anything different from what God had already established (Mat. 26:39), and only to make it more full (Mat. 5:17).

Foundational Principles:

1. God NEVER changes!
– Malachi 3:6
– God promises that He will always be faithful to His covenant with Israel, despite their infidelity. Nowhere in Scripture is any condition placed on this covenant in that God will “do away” with it due to the Israelites unfaithfulness.
– James 1:17
“Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, coming down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shadow due to change”

2. Yeshua was God’s plan from the very beginning, not a “plan B”
– Luke 24:27
– 2 Sam. 7:12-15, Isa. 7:14, Isa 9:6-7, Isa 50:6, Isa 52:13-53:12, Jer 23:5-6, Dan 7:13-14, Mic. 5:2-4, Zech. 9:9, Zech 12:10-12

3. God’s commandments were not given as a means of salvation: sacrifices have no power to justify a person, only to sanctify them before God
– Heb 9:13-14

4. Salvation has always been accomplished through faith and not by works
– Heb 11:1-12


Arguments


Claim: Noahic Covenant – made with the animals

– I think you are referring to Gen 9:9-17, where God makes the covenant with Noah, his offspring, and “every living creature,” and seals it with the sign of the rainbow, which is “an everlasting covenant.”

– Gen 9:9-17 “For all future generations”

– This is also an everlasting covenant, not to be undone by anyone or anything, including another, later covenant.

– Still in effect, and hasn’t been done away with.


Claim: Abrahamic Covenant – made with Abraham and all of His seed. Abraham was asleep. God made this covenant, therefore no one can change it.

– Can you point to a covenant in the scriptures between God and man that was not initiated by God? Here are just a few examples of this same covenant reiterated and reestablished by God

– Genesis 12:1-3 “All the families of the earth”

– Gen 12:7 “To your offspring I will give this land”

– Gen 15:5 “As the stars & sand”

– 15:7-21 “Sojourners and strangers, slavery”

– 17:7-8 “Between you and your offspring” “an everlasting covenant” “Circumcision”

– 18:10 “ A son will be born”

– 21:18 – Ishmael to be a great nation

– 22:16-19 “Because you have done this”


Claim: Mosaic Covenant – “God gave the covenant to Moses but the people said no! That is why JESUS did away with this one.”

– God made this covenant with the entire multitude of Israel, including Moses and the many egyptians that fled Egypt with Israel, not just Moses (Ex 12:37-38, 19, 34:27-28)

– When and where did Jesus “do away with” this covenant?

– This covenant is summarized when God says “I will be your God, and you shall be my people;” the commands of the Torah were simply the detailed instructions of what it looks like to be God’s people, in the exact same way that God’s mercy and lovingkindness and favor is what it looks like for God to be our God.

– It is generally accepted by Biblical scholars that the 10 commandments were the “preamble” to the rest of the commands given in the Torah. If Yeshua “did away” with the whole covenant, then by doing so He also denounced God as being the One True God who redeemed the Israelites from captivity, and condones idolatry and all the other sins outlined in the 10 commandments.

– How can God say “thousands of generations” (Ex. 20:5) if less than 50 generations later He would “do away with” everything He established? *(Matt. 1)

– Why are some parts of this covenant still relevant but not others, like food, and how do we determine which ones have been done away with? (Ex. 21-23 is full of laws dealing with simply treating other people kindly and with dignity, which of these are “done away with?”)

– Mat. 5:17-18 “I did not come to abolish, but to fulfill… until heaven and earth pass away not one jot or tittle shall pass.” Just as His coming (and therefore fulfilling the Messianic prophecies) did not “do away with” the promise of his coming and the redemption of God’s people, his fulfilling of the Torah did not do away with it either. Yeshua specifically says right after that that not one jot or tittle will pass from the Torah until heaven and earth pass away, and whoever breaks even the least of the commandments and teaches others to do the same will be least in the kingdom.

– When and where do the Israelites say “no” to the covenant?

– Ex 19:8 “All that the LORD has spoken we will do”

– Yes they sinned by creating the golden calf, but they also paid the price for that sin (Ex. 32:27-28, 35)

– Yes, the Israelites turned away from God and made a golden calf even before Moses had come back down the mountain, but just as the rainbow reminds God of his promise to never flood the earth again, Moses reminded God of His promise to make them a great nation. God still upheld and honored this covenant despite their nearly immediate betrayal. It was Moses who broke the tablets, literally “broke” the covenant, but God renewed it, writing it all on new tablets.

– Ex 32:10 “That I may make a great nation of you.” God never said that his covenant with Moses was nullified simply because of the golden calf incident. What he did say was “I will destroy them and start over with you.” Did God actually do this? No. Does this mean God changes his mind? No. Just as a parent may relent from severely punishing their child in the moment doesn’t mean that that child will go unpunished, and God addresses this fact in v. 34 “in the day when I visit, I will visit their sin upon them.”

– If Jesus did away with even one word of the Commands/Covenant/Torah/Scriptures, he broke the very law that defines His Messiahship, therefore nullifying His qualification as the sinless Messiah

– Deut. 13:1-5, anyone who performs miracles in the name of the LORD and teaches others to stray from God’s commandments is a false prophet, and should be put to death.

– 1 John 3:4-6 says that sin is lawlessness, and it was this lawlessness that Jesus appeared in order to take away, because in Him there was no lawlessness. Nobody who abides in Jesus keeps on practicing lawlessness, nor have they even known Him. If Jesus came to “do away with the law” then He could not, at the same time, take away lawlessness.

– 1 john 2:4, Anyone who says they know him but do not keep His commandments is a liar; in v 6 it says that if we abide in Him, we ought to walk in the same way He walked.

– God is faithful to keep His promises even when we fail to serve Him, which is the definition of mercy and grace!

– Jer. 30 is full of detailed descriptions of all the ways that God’s people will suffer for their foolish betrayal of His covenant, and vividly describes how God will allow them to be punished “because your sins are flagrant,” and even despite this God explains how He will rescue and save His people from the lands where they are scattered as well as punish any of the nations who treats them with contempt.

– Jer 31:0 “Is Ephraim my dear son? Is he my darling child? For as often as I speak against Him, I do remember him still. Therefore my heart yearns for him; I will surely have mercy on him.”

– God chastises Israel and they are punished for their disobedience, but He never even once implies that He will blot out or revoke His covenant with them.

– Scripture is filled with the covenant being renewed and reestablished and reaffirmed many times over. God did not forsake His side of the covenant simply because the people sinned – and he hasn’t to this day!

– Ex. 34:10-26

– In Deut. 29 This covenant was once again renewed with the next generation of Israelites in Moab right before they entered the promised land

– In Deut. 30, God explicitly tells the Israelites that after they turn away and serve other gods, if they will “return to the LORD” and obey all the commandments set before them, then He will be with them and they will prosper as a nation.

– Ezekiel 11:9-10

– Ezekiel 11 16-21

– There are no references in the scriptures that indicate that a failure to keep the commandments will result it being removed from the covenant or being considered “not God’s people”

– The entire history of Israel’s relationship with God can be summed up by this: Redemption, dedication, fornication, punishment, repeat. 1st John 3:4 says that “Everyone who makes a practice of sinning practices lawlessness; sin is lawlessness.” And he continues in v. 5 “You know that he appeared in order to take away sins, and in Him there is no sin.” Yeshua appeared to take away lawlessness.


Claim: Davidic Covenant – through David’s line Messiah would come

– No issues with this, Isaiah and Psalms and many of the other prophetic writings are full of this type of promise, these are the Messianic prophecies, by which we can know that Jesus is the promised Messiah! Without the foundation of Torah and the prophets (the “old testament”) we cannot know that Jesus is who He claimed to be.


Claim: New Covenant – God the Father made with His Son, JESUS and that includes us when we believe on HIM.

– In much the same way that the “old covenant” was summed up by the words “I will be your God, and you shall be my people,” the new covenant will be summarized by the words “For they shall all know me.” This verbiage is very similar to that in Phil. 2:11 “Every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord”

– This has not come to pass yet, neither has the City been “rebuilt for the Lord” according to the rest of the “New covenant” passage in Jer 31.

– Yeshua said at the last supper “This is my blood of the covenant,” only the book of Luke uses the phrase “new covenant” when describing this scene.

– Luke 1:57 begins Zechariah’s prophecy, and He specifically prophecies that God has visited His people to redeem them, and goes on to further illuminate that part of this salvation promise is that it will lead to God’s people “to remember His holy covenant,” to “serve Him without fear in holiness and righteousness.” This is very clearly a true prophecy that, much like all other biblical prophecy, has an immediate as well as a future fulfillment. It is undeniable that the full fruition of this prophecy has yet to be fulfilled, as the Jews still largely reject Jesus.

– In Romans 11:5-6, paul is talking about the remnant of Israel that have been have been chosen by His grace to remain as his Chosen people. It is logical to conclude that He is referring to those who believed in Yeshua as being the Messiah, but the grace he refers to is talking about being part of the remnant on the account of mercy instead of works, it is not talking about how salvation works so as to discard the commandments.

– Rom. 11:11 “To make Israel Jealous.” Why would a people who consider themselves special because of their covenant with God be jealous of a people who forsake that covenant entirely? Throughout history, regardless of their status (obedience) before God, their identity has always been founded on their covenant with Elohim. Why would they be jealous of a people or a Messiah who tells them to abandon their covenant with God? It is this very notion that causes Jews to reject Jesus in the first place!

– Yes, the blindness of Israel has to do with their disbelief due to their hard hearts (rom 11:7, 25), but they were also deceived by the religious rulers who spoke of Yeshua as a sabbath breaker and a blasphemer, which he was not. Further, Yeshua tells us himself that their blindness had to happen in order to fulfill the prophecies in Psalms. They crucified Him on the grounds of being a blasphemer! But was he really? The Gospel’s tell us that Yeshua knew no sin, so if He did break the sabbath or blasphemed, then He was not the true Messiah. Clearly the people were deceived, which is why they did not believe his testimony.

– Jer 30:21 says that the prince of His people “will be one of themselves” and goes on to describe how”He” (their prince) will draw near and approach God, and then he reestablishes the covenant again in v. 22

– Where is Israel’s prince that has the authority to approach God without losing his life? This prophecy has not yet been fulfilled, neither has the fullness of the covenant that is spoken of in Jeremiah come to pass yet. Yes, we are the first fruits, but the entire prophecy has to be fulfilled as it is written or Jeremiah’s writings are false prophecy.


Claim: The law given to Moses lists 613 laws. No one has nor can keep them all. GOD wanted His people to understand that they need HIM only.

– Nobody was ever supposed to be able to keep them all.

– As a man, there are laws that only pertain to women that I could not keep even if I tried.

– As someone living outside Israel, there are laws that can only be kept within Israel.

– As a forerigner (not of Jewish heritage) even if I lived in the land, there are laws that I would not be able to keep because I am a “foreigner.”

– As a common man and not a priest, there are laws that only the priests could keep.

– Even Yeshua did not keep every single one of the 613 commands, because he was neither of priestly lineage [Heb 8:4] (He was of the tribe of Judah, not Levi) nor was he a woman, or (as far as we know) a land owner, slave owner, or business owner. The point of the Law was not to see how many one person could keep – that would imply righteousness by works – they were literally laws by which to abide as God’s people for righteous living. In the same way, obeying the laws of society does not make you a just person. You can never break a law and still be evil and hate your neighbor. To say that the law is useless or obsolete because nobody can keep every single one perfectly would be to say that God is a spiteful god who just wanted to see people fail to make a point. This is even more cruel when you consider that it wasn’t for another 1500 years or so until He sent a means of redemption according to this thinking.

– Even Adam and Eve couldn’t keep from breaking the single command they were given. Where Adam and Eve went wrong was not in their disobedience, it was in their pride and failure to repent, just like Israel throughout their entire history. Throughout the scriptures, God repeatedly warns Israel that “if you will not turn from your wicked ways” then punishment and suffering will come. God want’s us to be contrite and have a right heart. He doesn’t expect perfection or nobody would ever be good enough even if they believe in Jesus.

– In a way, the Law is an act of mercy because through it, we are given many opportunities to repent when we fall short of God’s expectations. God never threatens His people for their failure to keep them, He only promises to cut someone off for very specific things that are either detestable to him or things regarding the Holy days when he desires to meet with us. Aside from these things, there is always a promise to reconcile the relationship if the people will only repent.

– Gal. 2:16 We are dead to the works of the law as a means of trying to become worthy. We always have been. The Torah was never intended to make a person righteous or justified. The Torah was given in order that the Israelites who obeyed it would be holy, set apart, from the nations. It was never an issue of salvation, as much as some tried to make it that. It would be absurd to try to gain Salvation or justification by our own merits.


Claim: GOD never intended for His people to have Kings. But, the people insisted because they wanted to be like everyone else. Kings are only people (sinners like us all) and did not always seek Adonai. When they didn’t, the results were punishment which included exile and slavery. When they did seek Adonai, GOD blessed…..

– Agreed. No issues here.

– Samuel 15:22-23

– And Samuel said, “Has the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to listen than the fat of rams. For rebellion is as the sin of divination, and presumption is as iniquity and idolatry. Because you have rejected the word of the LORD, he has also rejected you from being king.”


Claim: GOD sent several prophets to the Jewish nation in order to try to get HIS people to live the way HE wanted them to.

– Agreed. And they would then repent, and walk in His ways for a time, and then stray from His commands. This was one of the things that proves God is merciful, because He promised that He would be their God and they would be His people, no matter what. When they walked in His ways, he showed them His favor and they flourished as a nation. When they didn’t, He didn’t simply abandon them, he let them reap the consequences of their actions. Sometimes that meant that He would allow them to be punished, but in the end the promise to redeem them never faltered or changed.


Claim: For about 400 years prior to the birth of Messiah (JESUS), GOD withheld all conversations with His people. (The Macabeean period) HE sent no more Prophets. There were a few Israelites that knew they should be worshipping Adonai only, but most did not. The Maccabee family did serve Adonai and all 5 boys followed their fathers teaching. Judah Maccabee was the warrior that lead the Israelite people to defeat the pagans that had taken over their country. Since Adonai had not spoken in many years, Judah prayed, studied Torah and followed the examples of previous Godly warriors and GOD blessed. When ever he took his eyes off of GOD (not often) he failed. As good of a job as the Maccabees did to bring the people back to worship Adonai, even Judah Maccabee, shortly before his death, made a pact (treaty) with Rome for their promised protection. That is why the Romans were everywhere during JESUS’ time on earth.

– This is True that the voice of God became nearly silent for that period, at least as far as we have recorded in the Canon of Scripture. However, the last (known) prophet before this period was Malachi.

– Malachi 3:1 refers to the promised redeemer as “the mesenger of the covenant in whom you delight.” What covenant did the priest’s dlight in? He continues in 3:3-4 saying that when that messenger comes, “He will refine the sons of Levi, and the offerings of Judah and Jerusalem will be pleasing to the Lord, as in the former days.”

– Malachi 4:4 sternly warns Israel to “Remember the law of my servant Moses, the statutes and rules that I commanded him at Horeb for all Israel.” Why would God give such a stern warning, followed by the prophecy about sending Elijah before the day of the Lord, only for Yeshua to come less than 500 years later and sweep under the rug the very thing God warned them to remember?


Claim: much prophecy of the Messiah is throughout the OT. I don’t understand why all believers don’t celebrate the birth of Messiah. The answer to 1000’s of years of prayers!!!

– Without these prophecies, nobody would have known what he would do. He fulfilled every single messianic prophecy, which was why some recognized him as the Messiah while others did not and do not.

– The relevance of His birth is not lost, it is simply not celebrated in the way that some would like. So the answer to why someone would choose to not adopt the sad worldly version of celebrating the birth of Jesus can be found when God tells His people very explicitly not to worship Him in the ways that the nations worship their gods. (Deut. 12:4, 29-31)

– Further, not that it detracts from the fundamental importance of his earthly birth, to celebrate the birth of a deity was a very common pagan practice both before and following the birth of Jesus, so anyone who truly wants to worship God in the way which He chooses should be hesitant to adopt a practice that was so associated with false gods.

– The importance of His birth has never been lost on me; I recognize that failure to be born in a human body from a human mother would have negated the central aspect of Yeshua’s identity and ability to empathize with our human struggles. However, the absence in my life of a big celebration focused solely on His birth has never once caused me to question the credibility or sincerity of what I believe in the way that celebrating Christmas did before I ever even questioned the origins of the holiday.

– Lastly, I don’t believe there is anything even remotely wrong or immoral in purely celebrating the birth of the savior. I don’t agree with adapting pagan traditions and devoting them to God (the very thing that he says is abominable). However, I would much rather devote my time, thoughts, and energy in attempting to worship God by keeping the Holy days that He has explicitly commanded His people to keep, special appointed times that are set aside BY HIM and to be times when He draws closer to us, than worry about keeping a secular human tradition just because it seems important. This is the same reason why Hannukah isn’t really emphasized in our house beyond just the fun of giving the kids presents and remembering how God once again saved His people from bondage.


Claim: JESUS addressed the Law in Matthew (sermon on the amount), but he was talking to Jews, not Gentiles. AND—— HE hadn’t died for our sins yet.

– Almost all of what Jesus said was spoken to Jewish crowds. He appeared to Jewish people, and taught in Jewish synagogues. Why would that exclude what he said from applying to those who would be saved by faith in him after his ascension? If a branch is grafted into the tree, it does not become a new tree, it becomes an extension of that tree and takes on some of the characteristics of the original tree; the original tree is not changed, only the branch that is grafted in. A brand new, completely different tree is not formed by grafting in a branch.

– If Yeshua’s words to the Jews prior to His sacrifice were “only for the jews” because he hadn’t died yet, which of His commands are we as Gentiles supposed to keep?

– If we are only to take as “gospel truth” the words of Jesus that were spoken to non-jews or that were spoken by him after he died, we would be left with a lot of questions. Either all of Jesus’ words are for all of His followers (Jew or gentile ) or none of them are for us unless we are Jewish.

– If Jesus’ words to the jews were only intended for the Jews, then much of Jesus’ words are not for us; however, Jesus specifically prays on behalf of all who will know him through the testimony of those Jewish men that he taught so intimately.


Claim: JESUS celebrated the festivals- again HE hadn’t died yet.

– Yes He did, and John tells us in 1 John 2:6, “Whoever says he abides in Him ought to walk in the same way in which He walked.” Jesus IS God, and God never changes. If we believe this, and if we believe that a house divided against itself cannot stand, then either Jesus was not God as he claimed, or our understanding of what Jesus did needs to be reexamined. I tend to err on the side of assuming that my understanding is flawed, not Jesus’ message.


Claim: Paul celebrated the festivals, but only with his Jewish friends.

– Paul wrote the book of Corinthians to the church in Corinth, which was full of greeks. And yet still Paul even instructs the Corinthian believers in 1 Cor. 5:6-8 to “keep the feast” with sincerity and truth. It is a fallacy to assume that everything written in scripture lacks a literal meaning simply because an explanation is not attached to it. The only scripture in existence at the time Paul wrote his letters were the Hebrew scriptures (Torah) and there was an assumption in all churches that study of the Torah was being practiced and that the reference to “keeping the feast with the new leaven” would not only be an allegory, but also a reference to keeping the feast with right intentions.

– Gals 2:16 Paul Was arguing against faith plus circumcision as a means of salvation, not righteous obedience to God’s commands.

– All things to all people ≠ hypocrisy. Paul did not live “as a jew to the jews” and “as a gentile to the gentiles.” If this were the case, how could he have been justified in confronting Peter – the chief apostle (Gal. 2:9) – regarding Peter’s own hypocrisy in doing such things?

– Gal 2:11-14: James was caught in the act of “living like a Jew among the Jews, and as a gentile among the gentiles.” Oaul called him out on this, and “opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned.”

– In Acts 21, Paul visited James in Jerusalem. When he arrived, the believers there reported to him how many of their fellow Jews had been added to the numbers of believers. Specifically, they report that (v. 20-24) “they are all zealous for the Law, but they have heard reports that you have been teaching Jews to forsake Moses and teaching against circumcision. What should we do about this? Here is our solution, join these 4 men in their Nazarite vow, and purify yourself by taking the same vow, and pay for their sacrifices along with yours so that they may complete their vows and shave their heads, that way everybody will know that there is no truth to these reports, but that you yourself also live inn observance of the law.”

– What is this all about? Were the Jerusalem believers conspiring with Paul to fool the Jewish believers and non-believing Jews into thinking that he hadn’t been teaching against keeping the Law, and was in fact still practicing the Law himself? Were they really so devious? Paul had just poured out his heart in desperation to lay down his life in order to visit Jerusalem, so why would he be afraid of what some of the young believers thought about some supposedly false report? If Paul really was this deceitful, then his words ought not to be trusted.

– Instead, we see further down in v. 26 that the next day Paul purified himself by doing a mikveh, or ritual baptism, and took the 4 men to the temple to notify the priests when the days of their vow would be completed so as to prepare the sacrifice associated with the Nazarite vow.

– Later, after being arrested, Paul pleas with the people to believe his testimony, crying out “I am a Jew, by Rabbi Gamaliel, under the strict

– Acts 28:17-25:
– V. 17 Paul calls the local Jewish leaders, who would have had nothing to do with him had there been any credible widespread complaints about this formerly infamous Jew who studied under the tutorship of the Chief Priest (Gamaliel) teaching people to disregard Torah, and Paul capitalizes on the fact that the rumors of him teaching people to forsake Torah observance were untrue
– V. 18 They examined the evidence (of which there was none to prove Paul’s guilt as a heretic) and wished to set him free
– v. 21 “We have received no letters about you, nor has anyone spoken any evil about you”
– V. 22 “We want to hear your stance, because we are familiar with the sect of The Way
– V. 23, Paul uses “the law of Moses” to convince them of Jesus’ Messiahship
– V. 24, … and some were convinced! Hallelujah! Paul used the Torah to convince some of the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem that Jesus is the Messiah!

– 2 Pet. 3:15-16
– Even Paul’s contemporaries found his letters difficult to understand, and Peter warns that people twist his words to their own destruction, just as they do “the other scriptures.”

– 1 Corinthians 11:27 “Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty concerning the body and blood of the Lord.

– If paul only celebrated the Jewish festivals with his Jewish friends, why is he warning the Corinthian church about easting the Passover meal “in an unworthy manner?” (Num. 9:10-11)


Claim: Luke 22:20 – JESUS’ words indicate the establishment of a New Covenant

– Yes, but only in this one account of the Last supper is the word “new” used. Even so, a new covenant does not necessarily usurp or negate the original. Couples renew their wedding vows all the time, it doesn’t undo anything that was done before, it simply reestablishes the existing covenant in light of the experiences and observations ascertained up to that point in the relationship.

– Jesus uses the same greek word for “new” when he says in John 13:34 “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another.” How can this commandment be new while at the same time He also says that the entire Torah depends on loving your neighbor?


Claim: Hebrews 8:8 quotation of Jeremiah 31:31-34, promising a new covenant

– No, v. 1-7 of Heb 8 says specifically that the point of what the author is saying is that “we have such a high priest” and talks about how Yeshua specifically would not be a priest if he were here on earth because he would not be qualified to offer sacrifices “according to the law.”

– V. 8 specifically says “He finds fault with “them” referring to the earthly priest

– The Jeremiah 31 covenant prophecy has not yet been fulfilled so long as there are people who need to be taught the ways of God and His commands. Writing the covenant on the hearts of the nations does not equate to disregarding the written law of God in the Torah. What good is it to have the covenant of my marriage written on my heart if I don’t hold to it with my actions and life?


Claim: Hebrews 8:13 the new covenant makes the old covenant obsolete

– False, the word “covenant” is not in any of the original manuscripts in this verse, because the subject matter that the Hebrews author is writing about is the priesthood, not the covenant. A better reading of this verse would be “In speaking of the new priesthood, He makes the first one obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away.”


Claim: Hebrews 9:15 how the NEW Covenant works

– Again, the word “covenant” is not found anywhere in this chapter before v. 15 (look at Strongs, it’s not there)

– This is because the writer is talking about the Heavenly priesthood of Jesus and the work He performed as our High Priest.

– Look at the context of the entire chapter: The writer is contrasting what the earthly priesthood was required to do on a continual repetetive basis compared to what Jesus did once and for all

– This only “abolishes” or “fulfills” the commands of sin offerings and good will offerings and all other offerings if the reader assumes that it was the act of sacrificing an animal through which a person was redeemed. If you look at the structure of v. 13-14, the write is not saying “because the sprinkling of blood cannot purify,” but rather he is saying “if the sprinkling of blood sanctifies the flesh for ceremonial purity, then how much more will the sprinkling of Jesus blood purify our conscience”

– The Hebrews writer even states in V. 8 “By this the Holy Spirit indicates that the way into the holy places is not yet opened as long as the first section is still standing (which is symbolic for the present age). According to this arrangement, gifts and offerings are offered … which deal only with … regulations for the body imposed until the time of reformation.”

– Has the time of reformation come? Has heaven and earth been set right and been made new? The writer uses the present tense when referring to the sacrifices in the Temple, indicating that they were still ongoing and that he expected they would until creation was restored to the pre-sin state.


Claim: Hebrews 12:24 JESUS is the mediator of the NEW Covenant

– I don’t disagree that Jesus is and will mediate a new covenant when it is fully fulfilled, but the covenant that makes whole (“fulfills”) the pre-existing covenant does not get rid of the old.


Claim: Hebrews was written for the Jewish people

– So then why do you accept it as part of the Bible? What value is the book of hebrews to somebody who reject their identity as being grafted into the Jewish people?

– The book of Hebrews was written to people who may have been Jewish by birth but who had come to believe in Yeshua as the promised Messiah (aka Christians)

– Heb 1:3 also says that Yeshua is the “exact imprint” of God’s nature. God never changes, and His words are never made false. If God said that a commandment or instruction was “eternal” and then later negated any expectation for obedience to that command, then he is by very nature a liar. God’s plan did not change simply because the Israelites were unable to keep 613 individual commands on a national level. God planned from the beginning of creation to send a redeemer to fight the serpent and crush it’s head, and Yeshua was the ultimate fulfillment of that. However, simply because the fullness of the promise came does not remove the expectations that God has for those who claim to love him and desire to be His people.


Argument- I have no problem with anyone celebrating the Festivals. But, to me, the festivals are all meant to remember the past and what Adonai did for the Jewish people. Which is okay, but why not live in the freedom of the New Covenant and live the way JESUS wants us to today. HE said we HIS people and can do and will do anything HE does. We have dominion over this world except when we give it to the enemy. It’s time we live in the victory of JESUS and trample the enemy.

– I find freedom in the Torah. The deeper understanding of knowing exactly how God desires to be worshipped is one of the most freeing things I’ve ever experienced. I have never had to question if some tradition or practice is offensive or might bring shame to His name because I know that the practices and traditions I keep are rooted in His very words. When I celebrated Christmas, as I got older, I began to struggle with what it meant to actually “celebrate his birthday” and why that was relevant in a world that claims to do the same thing while also focusing almost entirely on the carnal and materialistic side of it. All my life I was taught that Christians are supposed to be “holy” or “set apart” from the world, all the while nearly every christian tradition and holiday originated in a secular holiday, whether it was pagan or not. I realize that that doesn’t automatically mean that anyone who celebrates christmas is guilty of materialism, but when you can’t tell the difference between the decorations, traditions, timing, songs, rituals, and overall materialism of the worldly christmas celebrations compared to those of “Christ followers” then it begs the question: If we are called to be “set apart” or “holy” then why are we copying, adopting, or even attempting to repurpose those worldly traditions that ultimately do nothing but cause us to blend in with the rest of the secular world? Knowing what my Creator does and does not want to be done in order to worship Him is the most freeing experience I could experience. Sure, its easy enough to say “Well as long as you’re ‘bound’ to only worshiping God according to the Bible you’re not truly free to worship Him in spirit.” However, trapping your mind and heart in this endless loop of “I’m free to worship however I please” only ever leads to mimicking the world and adopting their ways, which is something God specifically warns us against.

– The prophecies of Ezekiel and Zecheriah are FULL of prophecies about the future kingdom and the Holy days and the sacrifices that will take place, as well as warnings to the nations that the Lord will withhold the rain from those nations that do not come to Jerusalem for those specific feasts.

– Jesus only fulfilled the prophecies surrounding the spring feasts at His first coming.

– He was our passover lamb and redeemed us from the bondage of death and sin (Passover)

– He was without sin (unleavened bread)

– He was the firstfruits of the resurrection (feast of first fruits)

– The Holy Spirit (the Spirit is the spiritual manifestation of the same Jesus that came to earth and ascended after the resurrection) came to the believers in Jesus when they were in Jerusalem for the feast of Weeks (Shavuot)

– One day when he returns, He will fulfill the prophecies surrounding the Fall Feasts

– When the trumpet sounds at the feast of Trumpets (Yom Teruah) one day, every knee will bow and every tongue will confess that He is Lord when he returns (bonus, it is very likely that he was actually born on the day of Yom Teruah, which is historically also recognized as the day that David and various other kings were anointed as King)

– After defeating satan, he will establish His kingdom on earth and tabernacle with us (feast of tabernacles/Sukkot)

– At the end of days, there will be a great Judgement day, during which every person will account for the sins they have committed, which is spelled out in the Day of Atonement/Yom Kippur

Thoughts on Devarim (Deut. 1:1-3:22)

Tim Hegg, in his commentary on the Torah Portion Devarim, points out that the emphasis in Moses’ first message in Devarim is that there are consequences when we fail to trust in God’s promises. Even when it feels impossible, we must rely on God to remain faithful. Where the Israelites failed was not in thinking that they had it better in Egypt, but in doubting God’s goodness and faithfulness to keep His promises. Specifically, they failed to trust God’s promise that the land would be good and beneficial for them, and that they would be protected in their endeavor to conquer the inhabitants of the Land.

I can’t help but think of all the times when I have failed to trust God to provide or to remain faithful to His promise to provide everything we need. It’s so easy to trust in my own abilities, but I can’t help but recal all the times that my plan would have ended miserably (and sometimes did) were it not for God’s grace and faithfulness. Is that job really something that God wants for me, or is it simply a “good” job that would meet our needs, and cure my boredom? Is it God leading me to seek “better opportunities for my family” or is it my own will interfering with where God is trying to lead me. Too many times I have pursued what I thought was “best” only to find too late that God was testing me by giving me opportunities to learn to trust Him and wait on His timing. Did God bless my family despite my hasty actions or decisions? Absolutely! But it usually ends up being a more time consuming and painful learning experience than simply trusting in God to take care of the details. 

Buddy Brown stated that when God is trying to give us something truly great, that is when the enemy tries to give us something that is merely good in order to distract us from what God wants for us, by way of allowing us to justify choosing the lesser of the two. Something may appear good, especially if it is easy to obtain and has an empirical reward, but we need to be careful to not let that distract us from the greatness that God is calling us to, even if we can’t see the short term benefit. He will provide us the means to achieve what He has in store for us, and failing to trust in His guidance will result in negative consequences. The Israelites failed to trust God’s faithfulness when they disobeyed His command to take the land, and instead did what they thought to be “good” (heading into battle despite God’s warning) with dire consequences.

When the Israelites, in fear for the report of the 10 spies, disobeyed God’s command to go up and possess the land, Adonai warned them that he would not fight for them in battle against the inhabitants of the land. Because they feared the repercussions of their disobedience, the people decided to go up and fight to try to take the land despite God’s warnings. Tim Hegg states “sometimes even what appears to be right action can constitute rebellion.” Even tho they were eventually coming around to obeying, because they first acted stubbornly and disobeyed, they not only missed out on the blessing of God’s provision, but also suffered the consequence of acting outside His will. We ought to be careful to take inventory of our hearts and rectify what is our own will against what God is truly leading us towards. Hastily acting in order to achieve something “good” may cause us to head in the opposite direction of where God is truly leading us, towards something great. We would be so much better off learning to trust God’s faithfulness and simply obey, than thinking we know better. 

If only it were so simple! 

Fortunately there is hope for us in Messiah, as Paul says in Romans: 

“I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate. (v. 15)

“There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Messiah Yeshua, for the law of the Spirit of Life has set you free in Messiah Yeshua from the law of sin and death.” (8:1)

To Chris Mallia

Hey Chris,

It’s Andy. I know its been a long time since we’ve spoken but I wanted to reach out to you and tell you a few things that have been on my heart lately. I know that when we last spoke it was painfully awkward and cut short, and that is because of the self righteousness in my heart that told me I somehow knew better than you. I know now how wrong that was. When we left the Lighthouse LITTLE group, it was for completely ill-informed and prideful reasons. I am not shifting the blame on others, because we thought we were doing the right thing. We truly did. We were arrogant kids who were taught to think that the church is an “ultimate authority” over a person’s spiritual life, and that “good Christians” ought to have an “authority” figure over them other than Christ Himself, despite what Paul says about this in Romans.

We accused you of what I have only ever known to be rumors that we could not verify – and did not make any effort to verify- before simply pointing the finger of blame at you. For a few years after, I was bitter towards you, thinking that you were wrong, and that you reacted poorly by kicking us out and banning us from ever coming back. I can see now that you were hurt by our accusations. You were hurt because you truly loved us. You loved me. You sacrificed yourself to lead me and guide me to do the things you truly believed were from God. And I completely took it for granted. You were a father figure to me during a time when my father wasn’t able to be, and although I was grateful for your mentorship, I never realized the significance of that role until now.

Now, when it’s too late.

But I am grateful for your leadership and mentorship, even though I didn’t realize how much I needed it back then. And I so badly needed it. Despite my young, dumb self choosing to chase things that didn’t matter, you always strove to teach me what it means to give of yourself, and how to love others for the sake of loving them. You lived that out on a daily basis in your own neighborhood, and everybody knew they could always count on you to be there to help them if they needed it.

And we paid that unconditional love back by taking the word of somebody who claimed they knew things about you, and spit in your face with it. For that I am truly sorry.

There was some level of Devine intervention in that decision, though. I went on to meet a girl later that year after leaving the LITTLE group. She was everything I had ever dreamed of finding in a woman: she taught me more about God, religion, Scripture, and living out my faith than I ever would have imagined. She helped to open my eyes to the truth of God’s word and the practical ways in which He calls us to live it out. If I had continued to be involved with the LITTLE group on a Saturday nights, though, we likely would not have met when we did, because it was a Saturday night when we met. We only met that night because a friend invited me to go to a movie with him, his brother, and his “friend,” who turned out to be Kayla. I only accepted his invitation because I had no plans after work that Saturday, which was still a strange transition for me to shift my brain into even 4 months later. We were engaged less than a year later, and married only a year and a half after meeting. We now have two incredible kids, and you would absolutely adore them, I’m sure. I often thought I would one day bring them all out to Lake Hills to meet you. I wish my kids could have gotten to know you and be loved by you the way that you loved me.

I ran into your wife about a year ago. I saw her at Walmart on De Zavala. I asked her how you were doing and if you were still ministering to the youth out there in Lakehills. Did she ever tell you about that? She looked healthy and happy, and that made my heart happy to see.

I’ve thought about you on almost a daily basis since that encounter with your wife last year. It has actually haunted me at times, thinking about the scripture that talks about reconciling with your brother before bringing your offerings before the Lord. In fact, just a little over 1 year before you died, I was sitting in church about to take communion, and the pastor made a beautiful request for anybody who is a believer that has any unabsolved hurts with another person to abstain from taking the communion until it is reconciled. Immediately, my heart was made heavy and my gut sank as I thought of you. I knew I needed to pay you a visit, since I had no other way of getting ahold of you, in order to atone for the hurtful words I said to you and the selfishness of my actions. But, as i have done so many other times in my life, I ignored what I now know and believe was nothing other than the urge of the Holy Spirit, and brushed it off. I told myself, “maybe some day I will go see him, but not today.” And I don’t know why. I guess I was embarrassed to explain it to my wife because even though she knows the story of what happened at the LITTLE group, I don’t think she empathizes with me since she is so disconnected from it, both physically and emotionally.

I’m sorry it has taken me so long to reach out to you. I don’t know why I have put it off all these years. It was only after running into Glynnis last year that I think God placed you on my heart again. I started thinking about my time there at the Lighthouse LITTLE group, and my experiences over those 3 years. I can’t even begin to count the ways in which those experiences changed and shaped my life. Not everything that happened there was fruitful or beneficial to the efforts you had made to strengthen the spiritual hold in that small community, but there is a lot about who I am today that simply would not be true without the love and growth that I experienced while working alongside you and getting to know and love the Lakehills community. I started thinking about the way that we hurt you, and I can’t help thinking that we justified it with a misunderstanding of scripture that had been stripped of its context, and twisted to conform to what most Christians falsely believe about spiritual authority in the church.

I know you were doing your best. You weren’t a perfect man, God knows, but He also knew your heart, and I still believe that you were truly convicted and passionately sold out to the mission of ministering to the families of Lake Hills. I just hope that, despite my behavior and hurtful words all those years ago, that you found it in your heart to forgive me. I miss your friendship and your encouraging spirit. I miss your positive outlook on every aspect of life. I miss the way that you didn’t put up with nonsense, and how you spoke up even when it was so unpopular to do so in the name of defending the truth.

I know this letter is far too little, far too late. And my heart is broken to think that I ignored God’s urging on my heart for nearly a year, and now I will never get the chance to tell you all of this.

I know that you are with Jesus now, and any hurt or pain brought on by the words or actions of others is something that doesn’t even translate in your renewed mind and body now.

It hurts my heart when I think of the opportunities I had to go see you on several occasions, and the fact that I always found an excuse not to. It pains me that I will never see you again on this earth. It saddens me to think of your wife and kids and granddaughter who miss you so dearly every day, and it brings tears to my eyes every time I think back to the horrible way you were taken from this earth.

I know that God had something bigger in mind, and the only encouragement I find in your passing is that Jesus just loved you so much and was so proud of who you were, and the way you represented him, that he didn’t want to wait to meet you any longer.

I miss you, and I look forward to the day we are reunited.

Love, Andy.

Thinking

I haven’t written anything philosophical or in any way deep in thought in so long I Donn’t even recall the last thing I wrote that came from within me. I have felt so dry for so long, my spirit is feeling parched and dry. I feel like I’m not even the same person I was when I first started this blog. From personal mistakes made in various relationships over the last 4 years, to selfish decisions that affected my family either financially or emotionally, I feel like I have lost touch with the person I once was. And it is nobody’s fault but mine. I have lost sight of the things that drive me. Those things that drive me as an individual. TI’ve lost what it means to love other people in a true way.

For so long I have been so focused on making sure that ends meet and bills are paid, that I have felt absolutely zapped of any remaining energy that might be left at the end of each day to contribute to helping and serving those around me who truly need it. Whether that be my immediate family including my wife, or even just simply reaching out randomly and helping those I encounter who truly need on either a physical or spiritual level.

I have lost touch with the side of me that longed to serve others selflessly.

At one point in time, I was easily moved by the sight of a person who needed even something basic, like food or a new jacket, that I would go and intentionally buy things with the intent of giving them away. I’m not tooting my own horn. There were certainly times where I felt it would be more convenient to just keep driving than to stop and take time out of my own schedule to do something for someone that may not even appreciate what was happening. But it was still in my heart to feel for those people and to truly love them from a point of view that saw those people as individual souls in need of saving, even if on a small level.

I haven’t been that person for several years now. Time out of my day has been sucked up with work, tasks around the house, or simply being available for my wife and kids, who I love deeply and would give all of my time and energy for. But I somehow lost sight of that love for those around me. And I think it can be pinpointed to my failure to seek God in all that I do. I have always thought of myself as being faithful, even if I did at times doubt God’s ability to rectify a situation the way I thought it should be rectified. Too many times of seeing things fall apart that I thought were from God, and rather than accepting that maybe His will was better and more informed than mine, questioned His love for me and, ultimately, His ability to provide for me. A long series of events over the course of 2016-2017 involving Job changes and missteps in choosing the right path for my family has inevitably lead me down a path farther from Him, rather than chasing what He has in store for my family.

I think, though, that God is trying to win me back. Something that happened yesterday that I failed to even recognize as a blessing from God, caught my attention by way of my own ignorance, and the fervent faithfulness of my wife, who refuses to give up on chasing God, even if I have without meaning to. Kayla and I had been talking about this wood working hobby of mine, and the fact that I haven’t felt motivated to keep up the momentum required in gaining attention to it via social media due to the drop off in outside interest displayed by other people since mid-May. It’s been a dry couple of months on that front, and I have sort of put it on the back burner due to the lack of interest of others in what I am offering. On top of that, we have been seeking what the best course of action would be in regards to our finances with planning on purchasing a house, since we only have a menial savings built up, not nearly enough for a down payment. Well, out of nowhere yesterday, I received an order on Etsy for 9 of the same item, totaling $315. I was just excited by the prospect of getting the order and making the money. It only briefly occurred to me that this was something from God, trying to get my attention.

I don’t even know where I’m going with this post, except to say that I don’t like the cold way that my heart has been towards others for so long, and I want it to change. I know that God is doing something behind the scenes in my life to get my attention, and I welcome it. Whatever it might be. I am ready for a change in my heart. For my wife’s sake, for my kids’s sake, for my sake. And for the sake of anyone I encounter who is in need that I can somehow be a blessing to. I want to get back to that attitude of servitude.

Why “pro-choice” really means “pro-abortion”

Pasted Graphic.tiff

choice |CHois|

noun

an act of selecting or making a decision when faced with two or more possibilities: the choice between good and evil.

The word choice is a funny thing. It really only has one meaning, but when it comes to determining the rights of a woman who is faced with an unexpected pregnancy that is either the result of carelessness or a bad situation that she had no choice over (which statistically is far less prevalent than what the media and our current society would lead one to believe), that choice can only lead in one direction: abortion.

“Women’s rights!” they scream at the top of their lungs. But when a woman walks into a crisis pregnancy center, likely knowing full well that the options she is going to be given will not include murdering the child, then the woman is said to be oppressed. She is oppressed because she wasn’t given “every” choice. She was denied the choice to murder another human being in the face of her crisis. Because obviously that’s the logical response to a bad situation. Just look at Timothy McVeigh. Can you blame the guy?

No. The options presented to a woman in her time of fear after finding out that she is pregnant should not actually be an all-encompassing list of choices that she can choose from. The only real choice she should have is to abort, because if you don’t offer a woman (living in a society where abortion is the assumed next most logical response after birth) the option to murder the human being growing inside her, you are no better than the Taliban who beat their women and rape their daughters.

Many “pro-choice” individuals and organizations would argue – ironically – against the right of a woman to choose life for her unborn baby if she is not first made completely aware of the fact that she can have it aborted for free. Or nearly free. Or not at all free, but still, it’s the best for everyone, right?

The world they live in – trigger warning here – is a world of flat out denial of truth and reality. They call “choice” what others would call an agenda to abort as many babies as possible. They call “anti-choice” what any sane person would see as a mother refusing to abort her unborn baby, simply because she didn’t mean to get pregnant. They think that the only logical response to finding out you are pregnant when you weren’t planning on becoming pregnant is to kill another human being. A defenseless, offenseless, tiny, cuddly, chubby, bald, toothless human being.

I take that back. They aren’t offenseless. They grossly offend any individual on the progressive left by their mere existence. It matters not whether the child was planned, accidental, or conceived in rape. They hate that child. Wholeheartedly and unapologetically. And they really do little to mask this hate either. They’re no better than Hillary claiming “what difference does it make anyway?” They know that they have a completely see-thru agenda, and they don’t care.

You know why they don’t care? Because they have a rich uncle named Sam who will get their back and fund their evil regardless of what the majority want. The minority is a vocal one, and they thirst for blood. Fetal blood, specifically.

Choice has only one meaning: selecting one of two or more possibilities. In reality, pro-life advocates are more “pro-choice” than the “pro-choice” group, because they give women actual choices in the face of crisis. And the left can’t stand that. They have only one choice in mind when faced with the decision to let an unplanned baby live or die comes up: that baby must die. In light of this, it is no surprise when  they think that a pro-life crisis pregnancy center needs to advise its clients about the available option to murder an unborn child. Since when do 95% of Americans not know about the option to abort an unborn child? It’s the 2nd most debated issue in nearly every realm of society.

This really is the same reason these same people who call themselves “pro-choice” can’t stand the idea of individuals owning guns: they are completely opposed to the defenseless being defended.

Any individual who claims to be “pro-choice” is really only anti-life, or they would be open to a woman choosing life for her baby without being force-fed the abortion options.

Our intentions really don’t count for much.

Deuteronomy 12:29-31

“When the Lord your God cuts off before you the nations whom you go in to dispossess, and you dispossess them and dwell in their land, take care that you be not ensnared to follow them, after they have been destroyed before you, and that you do not inquire about their gods, saying, ‘How did these nations serve their gods?—that I also may do the same.’ You shall not worship the Lord your God in that way, for every abominable thing that the Lord hates they have done for their gods, for they even burn their sons and their daughters in the fire to their gods.”

So many people I know, including myself in the past, would read this verse and say, “well, at least it doesn’t mean that to me!”

I used to celebrate Christmas. I never knew about the evil roots from which christmas actually originated, but when I first heard about it, my attitude was “well it doesn’t mean that to me.”

Since that time I’ve heard countless people defend their acceptance of evil rituals that have been recycled and reused to supposedly worship our Creator by saying something like “it doesn’t mean that anymore,” or, “it doesn’t mean that to me.”

And while that certainly may be the case that you aren’t thinking about the evil spirits behind certain images or symbols or practices, the fact remains that at one point in time, that’s what they stood for. And to our Creator and King who transcends time, it still does.

Before you think to yourself that just because those images and practices don’t carry that meaning to yourself, and that somehow G-d adapts to our intentions, read through that passage again.

It really doesn’t matter whether you think certain scriptures are still applicable or not. Our G-d, the Creator of the universe, the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, who never changes and never waivers, told us very clearly that it doesn’t matter if our hearts are in the “right place” or not. Things that our King deems abhorrent should also be considered abhorrent by us.

You shall not worship the Lord your God in that way, for every abominable thing that the Lord hates they have done for their gods

I love Jesus and Jesus hates gay cake.

Look, I know you think you’re winning brownie points with God or something by turning people away and refusing to offer them your services because of their sexual preference. But honestly, I think it would be a bigger ministry to people, and give much more respect to our Creator’s awesome Name (not to mention it would make you look like much less of a hypocrite/bigot/zealot/fool/whatever) if you — instead of touting your own holiness and “punishing the sinners for Jeezus!” by refusing to make their cake, bouquets, or invitations — just sell them the darn cake/bouquets/invitations rather than condemning them and spreading hate behind the mask of Christianity.

Jesus doesn’t require your cakes. He requires you to love people and not condemn them by somehow thinking that their sexual sins are worse than your own. Notice I didn’t say anything about “not judging anyone.” This is because it is utter baloney to think that we are prohibited as followers of Messiah from judging anyone. We are told to judge rightly. Judge fairly. Judge according to God’s standard, not your own. But definitely judge. Otherwise you’re susceptible to the lies and tricks of the devil.

This guy decided he would no longer sell wedding cakes at all at his Colorado based cake shop due to complaints that were filed against his business by a gay couple for refusing to sell them a cake for their “civil union.”
Look, I get it. You’re trying to prove a point by cutting off the majority in order to punish the few. It’s not a new form of logic. It’s not a very logical form of logic, but it’s still not new. There are other ways around it. Take “wedding cake” off your product list, and just tell everyone you don’t make wedding cakes, but still allow people to buy “ordinary cakes” that have the “special decorations” on it. That way your conscience is clean when the gays decide to be married, eat cake, and do other grotesque and bizarre gay people things.

I know, ridiculous.

Equally ridiculous, is when, in an effort to not be labeled “homophobic” by the masses, you claim that you’re only denying them cakes for their weddings, but you’ll do business with them for anything else, adding to your claim that it’s because “gay weddings destroy the sanctity of marriage.” It that truly is your desire, and your actions are not just driven by a greater fear of people than of the Creator, then you need to start asking people whether the wedding for which they are ordering a cake is their first. If your intent truly is to uphold the sanctity of marriage only (and also not to boost your own business’ publicity by making people mad and causing them to blast you on social media and the news, which is deception — something else Messiah condemns), you’ll deny wedding cakes to previously married straight couples as well as the gay couples. Statistically, divorced people do more to destroy the sanctity of marriage than the gay community ever will.

You could even include a note with your product that says something like “despite disagreeing with your lifestyle because the Bible calls it a sin, I will still offer my services to you because that is what my Savior would do, in addition to offering you eternal life for turning away from your sins, including but not limited to your sexual habits.” I think this would do a much better job of preaching the message that Messiah came to deliver, rather than throwing a tantrum like a 3 year old and punishing everybody because you don’t want to share with certain people. How does it glorify God if your business gets shut down by the corrupt society we live in, all in the name of standing up for your own personal belief that the sins of the gays are worse than the sins of the divorced heterosexual? It’s no secret that the world hates what God loves. It will always be against us. Yes, there is a great honor in your life being destroyed for the purpose of glorifying God, but you can do much more for the kingdom alive than dead. Even just in terms of your business.

If nothing else, if you really think about it, the “civil union” will most likely still take place regardless of whether they have a cake from your shop or not, so denying the service doesn’t help anything at all. It only makes you hated by the general public and doesn’t speak the words of Messiah. Messiah didn’t deny the prostitute her life because he disagreed with her promiscuous lifestyle. He also didn’t stop offering salvation to the majority of sinners because some of them might be gay, in an effort to spread His name farther. It’s not how He works. It’s not how we should either.

Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists

The Final Letter, as Sent:

“To messers. Nehemiah Dodge, Ephraim Robbins, & Stephen S. Nelson, a committee of the Danbury Baptist association in the state of Connecticut.
Gentlemen

“The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.

“Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should “make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,” thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.

“I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.”

Th Jefferson
Jan. 1. 1802.

Continue reading Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists

Things I think about, and some I probably shouldn't